 |
Quotations are a minefield. There are a thousand ways to go wrongputting
too much stress on quotations, quoting too much, quoting the wrong passages, blurring
the line between your voice and those of the sources you quote, disrupting the
flow of your argument, and so on. This section of Nuts
and Bolts presents generic advice on how to quote effectively. Read
it in tandem with the next sections on specific documentation styles. In this
section I have followed MLA documentation style, but the examples could easily
be adapted to Chicago or other styles. Within
the world of college essays, quotations rarely "prove" anything. What
good quotations usually do is support a particular interpretation. Yet one of
the most frequent mistakes college writers make is to say that a particular quotation
"proves" some claim. Here are some verbs that persuade better than prove:
suggests implies
testifies to | indicates
argues (that, for) shows | demonstrates
supports underscores | Suppose
for instance you're writing an essay on women in the workplace, and you find a
damning quotation from some CEO: "Women just don't make good bosses, and
I don't want them messing up my company." Here are the wrong and right way
to comment on this choice bit after quoting it:
| ORIGINAL |
REVISION |
| This
quotation proves that women encounter rampant discrimination in the workplace. | Smith's
comment suggests how much resistance women still face in the workplace. |
The original tries
to get too much from the quotation. It's just one comment, after all, not data
on the workplace at large. Stylistically, notice the change in attribution, from
This quotation to Smith's comment, a change in keeping with the
Nuts and Bolts principle of attaching
actions to real actors). Rule
# 1 for quotations: get the words right. Before I started teaching I wouldn't
have thought I'd need to say this, but a great many students seem to think it's
okay to get the gist of a quotation, and not sweat every apostrophe. That is not
in fact okay: like it or not, academics are fanatics about word-for-word accuracy.
What
if the original quoted passage has a mistake in it? Reproduce the misspelled word,
and, to notify the reader that this mistake occurred in the original, follow it
with the word sic in brackets (it's Latin for thus or so,
here signifying "it was like this already"):
| Halder
does his argument no credit when he opines, "History shows that men are more
intelligent then [sic] women" (34). | If
you need to change anything else in the quotation or add some comment within it,
indicate your change or addition by using square brackets [this], not parentheses
(not this). Sometimes
word-for-word accuracy by itself may lead to an unclear quotation. In the following
sentence from an original text, to what do the pronouns them and themselves
refer?
| SOURCE
I do not wish them to
have power over men; but over themselves. Mary
Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. Miriam Brody
[London: Penguin, 1992], 156). | Women,
it's not too hard to figure out, but if you don't explain this readers will hit
the pronouns like unexpected speedbumps. You may use brackets to insert an explanation:
| Mary Wollstonecraft
does not wish to reverse the sexual balance of power, but to move from domination
to autonomy: "I do not wish them [women] to have power over men; but over
themselves" (156). | Don't
get bracket-happy. Use them sparingly. A better general technique for explaining
terms in quotations is to introduce them or explain them after the fact, depending
on how your argument unfolds and what will work best for the reader, in your judgment
(for more on this see Integrating quotations below):
| Mary Wollstonecraft
wants women to strive for autonomy, not domination: "I do not wish them to
have power over men; but over themselves" (156). | Note
that 18th-century usage permitted Wollstonecraft to use a semi-colon where we
would require a comma. The quotation does not try to correct this. Quoting
too much is one of the commonest mistakes inexperienced writers make, as if they
think it's disrespectful to an original text to cut it into small pieces. But
there's nothing disrespectful about helping a quote make an emphatic point. Whenever
you quote, be aware of what you're looking for, and try to seize upon a sharp
and pithy excerpt:
| If the
Piazza del Duomo is the spiritual heart of Florence, the Piazza della Signoria
is its secular heart; D. H. Lawrence called it "the perfect center of the
human world." | | Barbara
Grizzuti Harrison, Italian Days (New York: Ticknor & Fields, 1989),
135. | | Marlowe's
Machiavelli calls religion a "childish toy."
| One
needn't go as far as Ralph Waldo Emerson's flat-out disdain for quotations, but
make sure that your essays don't look like patchwork quilts. Be selective in the
quotations you use, and be selective in what you quote from them, keeping only
the heart of the quotation as much as possible and keeping the rest of the paper
in your own voice and words.
The
best way to build a strong argument is to know the kind of argument a particular
discipline (or teacher) expects, and to have good
material on which to build. It's important to find the best quotations, the
ones that really serve your purpose. Students often gather quotations in a desultory
fashion, jumping about the text, stopping when they have what they deem a sufficient
number, and then forcing these into an essay regardless of how well they really
fit. But there's no shortcut to good research. An important part of the process
is going through texts with a fine-tooth comb, reading not only for comprehension
but for choice phrases. You should expect to end up with many more quotations
than you'll actually end up using in your essay. One tip: teachers will often
point out many of the best passages, so keeping track in class can prove helpful
come essay (and exam) time. When
you use quotations, you're letting someone else speak in the middle of your discourse.
That has its uses, of course, but it also risks confusing your reader about who's
speaking and what relation the quoted words have to your own argument. Student
writers are often oblivious to this risk because they're not used to looking at
what they've written from a reader's point of view. But consider the problems
your reader faces. He encounters quotations used for many different purposes:
to support or amplify an argument, to raise a new point, to present a point of
disagreement. Don't assume your reader will know why you're using a particular
quotation. There
are two main problems of clarity in using quotations: (1) Distinguishing your
own argument from the arguments of various quoted passages; and (2) making sure
the reader understands what a quotation is expected to accomplish.
1. Distinguishing
your own argument from the argument of a quotation Often
you'll wish to use quotations to summarize positions with which you'll disagree
a little or a lot. This is especially likely to happen when you're surveying past
studies or perspectives as a way of laying the groundwork for your own argument.
Here's how one prominent literary critic, Stephen Greenblatt, deals with previous
approaches to Shakespeare's plays:
| Those
plays have been described with impeccable intelligence as deeply conservative
and with equally impeccable intelligence as deeply radical. Shakespeare, in Northrop
Frye's words, is "a born courtier," the dramatist who organizes his
representation of English history around the hegemonic mysticism of the Tudor
myth; Shakespeare is also a relentless demystifier, an interrogator of ideology,
"the only dramatist," as Franco Moretti puts it, "who rises to
the level of Machiavelli in elaborating all the consequences of the separation
of political praxis from moral evaluation."
The conflict glimpsed here could be investigated, on a performance-by-performance
basis. . . . | | Stephen
Greenblatt, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in
Renaissance England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 23. |
Greenblatt wishes
to call attention to the "conflict," as he calls it, between these two
views of Shakespeare (conservative or radical). He's not trying to argue that
one or the other view is right, and so he crafts the passage to give each view
equal weight. In the larger essay from which this excerpt is taken, Greenblatt
develops his own perspective, an interpretive model that stresses "negotiation"
and ambivalence rather than imposed and settled meaning. Sometimes
one will want to use a controversial source. The best tack is to set up the quotation
in such a way that you show understanding of the controversy:
| ORIGINAL |
REVISION |
| Many
Germans participated in genocide: "an enormous number of ordinary, representative
Germans becameand most of their fellow Germans were fit to beHitler's
willing executioners" (Goldhagen 454). | Scholars
have long debated what degree of responsibility ordinary Germans bore for the
Holocaust. For Daniel Goldhagen the answer is clear: "an enormous number
of ordinary, representative Germans becameand most of their fellow Germans
were fit to beHitler's willing executioners" (454). |
The original presents
Goldhagen's words without any cognizance of the controversy surrounding his argument.
The revision, by contrast, takes note of the controversy. It may now go on to
agree or disagree with Goldhagen, or take a more nuanced view. The key point is
that it's created space for the writer's own view, rather than crowding that view
and the quotation's perspective together. 2.
Explaining the point or sense of a quotation The
other main problem of clarity that arises with quotations is to explain a quoted
passage's point. This is especially important when the original text is ironic
or carries some other non-obvious meaning. For example, the original passage below
presents a quotation from Shakespeare's great villain, Iago, without doing anything
to note its irony:
| ORIGINAL |
REVISION |
| Iago
says to Othello, "Who steals my purse steals trash; . . . / . . . / But he
that filches from me my good name / Robs me of that which not enriches him / And
makes me poor indeed" (3.3.157-61). |
Drawing Othello further into his
web, Iago suggests that public embarrassment would be intolerable: "Who steals
my purse steals trash; . . . / . . . / But he that filches from me my good name
/ Robs me of that which not enriches him / And makes me poor indeed" (3.3.157-61).
Iago, of course, is utterly contradicting his earlier declamation to Cassio on
the folly of reputation (2.3.256-61). | The
revision does a much better job of helping the reader make sense of the quotation,
its place in Shakespeare's play, and its function in the essay's argument. Quotations
need to be worked into texts, but some efforts to do this actually stop essays
dead in their tracks. Here a student thinks she must officially begin the quotation
with a clause like He states:
| ORIGINAL |
REVISION |
| The
tension builds when Brutus accuses Cassius of accepting bribes. He states, "Let
me tell you, Cassius, you yourself / Are much condemned to have an itching palm,
/ To sell and mart your offices for gold . . ." (4.3.9-11). | The
tension builds when Brutus accuses Cassius of accepting bribes: "Let me tell
you, Cassius, you yourself / Are much condemned to have an itching palm, / To
sell and mart your offices for gold . . ." (4.3.9-11). | Cutting
He states allows a stronger, livelier bridge to the quotation. In
similar fashion, students often feel they must announce that a
quotation or paraphrase serves as an example. But such careful announcements (along
the lines of you've just read an example of what I'm talking about) can
drag an essay down:
| ORIGINAL |
REVISION |
| The
Duke, disguised as a friar, gets a woman named Mariana to take Isabel's place.
This is one example of how the Duke plans just as a director would do. | The
Duke, disguised as a friar, gets Mariana to take Isabel's place. Here the Duke
acts like a skilled director. | The
revision sweeps the original's slow phrasing (This is one example of how)
into one word, Here. And notice that in the revision the writer came up
with a sharper verb and tighter phrasing. As
you think about integrating quotations, keep looking for ways to be more concise
and lively:
| ORIGINAL |
REVISION |
| In
The Prince Machiavelli states that the general requirement of a prince
is to "endeavor to avoid those things which would make him the object of
hatred and contempt" (64). | In
The Prince Machiavelli states that a prince should "endeavor to avoid
those things which would make him the object of hatred and contempt" (64). |
Make
sure your quotations fit grammatically into the essay. They can't simply be stuck
in anywhere. Like any other elements of writing, quotations must be presented
so as to make grammatical sense. Thus
a quotations that's an independent clause must not be spliced onto another independent
clause:
| WRONG |
RIGHT |
|
Hawking is at heart a rational empiricist, "I think there is a universe out
there waiting to be investigated and understood" (44). | Hawking
is at heart a rational empiricist: "I think there is a universe out there
waiting to be investigated and understood" (44). | In
general, introduce a quotation with a colon if the quotation consists of one or
more complete sentences and the introductory sentence also stands as a complete
sentence. If
the quotation is not a complete sentence, then you need to weave it into your
own sentence as you would any other word, phrase, or clause:
| In
medieval Europe love "was not the normal basis of marriage" (Trevelyan
64). Fortinbras
recasts Hamlet in his own image, as a "soldier" (5.2.385).
In Chapter
2 of the Second Treatise, Locke defines the state of nature as "a
state of perfect freedom . . ." (8). | Let's
look more closely at how to introduce quotations. Signal
phrases and statements let you introduce quotations with a minimum of fuss but
enough information to help the reader make sense of them. Often you'll want to
specify the author and text; other times you'll want to provide some other background
or context-setting information. No universal rule applies, except to ask yourself
what your reader needs to know to understand a quotation and its connection to
your argument.
| The
Founders understood the new Constitution as "a republican remedy for the
diseases most incident to republican government" (Madison 343).
In Federalist 51 Madison
observes, "Different interests necessarily exist in different classes of
citizens" (345). | Students
often use weak or vague signal phrases:
| ORIGINAL |
REVISION |
| Another
point about sexual difference is made by Rubin. She says, "The human subject
. . . is always either male or female" (171). | Rubin
questions whether unbiased kinship diagrams are even possible: "The human
subject . . . is always either male or female" (171). | The
original opens with an unhelpful sentence that specifies a topic but not an argument.
It follows with the choppy, rhythmless "She says" to introduce the quotation.
The revision presents Rubin's argument in a nutshell, and the "even"
explicitly ties the sentence back to an ongoing discussion, helping the reader
keep the flow in mind. The revision also eschews "She says" in favor
of an economical colon that moves speedily to the quotation. One
common way to build signal phrases is with the According to x construction:
| According
to W. C. Jordan, there were about 100,000 Jews in France in the middle of the
11th century (202). According
to Rich, we need to be careful about the risk of "presentism," of projecting
present meanings on past events (3). According
to the Polish critic Jan Kott the play is best understood as a "great staircase,"
an endless procession of falling and rising kings (10). | Another
technique, and one in keeping with the Nuts and Bolts
preference for action-oriented writing, is to use clauses with the cited scholar
as subject and a signaling verb to orient the quotation. Indeed, signal phrases
(or clauses) are a great place to get strong verbs into academic writing. Here
are some variations on the basic signal phrase construction of author + verb
(+ that):
| Rich
warns us that we need to be careful about the risk of "presentism,"
of projecting present meanings on past events (3). Patterson
reviews the legal limits placed on the murder of slaves (190-93). |
Depending on what
you want your reader to know, you can provide all sorts of explanatory material
in a signal phrase. Here, for instance, a writer identifies his sources' scholarly
expertise in order to make the citation more persuasive:
| The
economic historians Nathan Rosenberg and L. E. Birdsell note that
in the early capitalist period (from the late fifteenth century on) people had
to outgrow firms based on kinship and separate their personal finances from their
firm's finances. . . . [A long quotation follows] |
| Francis
Fukuyama, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (New
York: Free Press, 1995), 154. | Whether
or not you need such explanations depends on your audience; in this case Fukuyama
was writing for a general audience that would not be expected to be familiar with
the names of the cited scholars. One
more comment about integrating quotations into an essay: pay attention to rhythm.
Here's an in instance in which the writer elegantly integrates a quotation into
her own prose. See if you can figure out what she did:
| "Folktales,"
Calvino said, "are real." They catalog potential destinies, the trials
of achieving maturity and a full humanity. They are psychologically apt, of course;
but Italian folktales also owe a great deal to social realities, to history and
to class. . . . | | Harrison,
Italian Days, 436. | First,
the writer breaks up the quotation with that inserted signal phrase Calvino
said. That separates Calvino's subject, folktales, from the predicate,
are real. The effect is to solemnize Calvino's judgment, giving it the
rhetorical oomph of truth (this is a highly effective writer's trick). Second,
the writer uses the quotation's shortness and simplicity as a springboard to her
own more complex sentences and diction. This balancing of long against short,
complex against simple, detail against general, is something good writers do all
the timeeven with the quotations woven into their texts. In
all citation styles, when you wish to include long quotations (more than four
lines), you should do so in set-off block format. Left-indent the set-off quotation
an appropriate amount (often a half-inch) and prepare for it with a signal statement
ending in a colon:
| Steven
Katz wryly deconstructs one of the leading figures in the modern Christian tradition:
"The Jews" did
obsess Luther. They were of immediate, desperate, overwhelming concern. Though
as both Oberman and Mark Edwards, following a long tradition of Lutheran scholars,
emphasize, no more so than a number of other enemies, for example, the Catholic
church, the papacy, and the Turks. . . . Luther was a great hater, an ecumenical
hater, and Jews had a prominent place on his hate list. (1:388-89)
Privacy, one observer suggests,
is the cardinal virtue of the Dutch: Dutch
citizens are proud of their country; they think well of it, and they want you
to think well of it, but they do not necessarily want to unpack it, know all the
details, sometimes tear the paper from the cracks, and reach independent judgments.
. . . Never in the line of duty have I been bamboozled as in The Netherlands,
where they all tell you different things, no one want to make a full disclosure
and they will pick holes in any generalization you care to profess. . . . (Peter
Lawrence, in Lawrence and Edwards 167) In
his study of the budgeting practices of more than 400 U.S. firms, Unapathy found
budget games and manipulation were widespread: Deferring
a needed expenditure [was the budget game] used with the highest frequency. .
. . Getting approvals after money was spent, shifting funds between accounts to
avoid budget overruns, and employment of contract labor to avoid exceeding headcount
limits are the other relatively popular games. . . . (90) |
| Robert
Simons, Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive
Strategic Renewal (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1995), 83. |
Note that a good
signal statement often gives a quick summary of the quotation.
Set-off quotations do's
and don'ts: - Use
a complete statement, not a fragment, to signal the quotation.
- Punctuate
the signal statement with a colon.
- Indent
on the left (from a quarter-inch to an inch, depending on format and teacher requirements).
- Don't put
quotation marks around the set-off quotation.
- Put
a space after the quotation's terminal punctuation and then supply the parenthetical
reference (see the examples above; note that this differs from punctuating short
quotations).
| WRONG |
RIGHT |
| Fombrum
says, "A
name essentially describes how a company is perceived on the outside. It signals
to outside observers what a company stands for; the quality of its products. When
the value-priced cosmetics maker Avon tried to improve its reputation by purchasing
the prestige retailer Tiffany's in 1979, most doubted the wisdom of the move.
That's why it came as no surprise when five years later Avon sold off the operation.
Not only did owning Tiffany's fail to add luster to Avon, but negative publicity
about Avon ownership was rapidly tarnishing Tiffany's reputation (Fombrum 42)." |
Names can be highly valuable
business assets: A
name essentially describes how a company is perceived on the outside. It signals
to outside observers what a company stands for; the quality of its products. When
the value-priced cosmetics maker Avon tried to improve its reputation by purchasing
the prestige retailer Tiffany's in 1979, most doubted the wisdom of the move.
That's why it came as no surprise when five years later Avon sold off the operation.
Not only did owning Tiffany's fail to add luster to Avon, but negative publicity
about Avon ownership was rapidly tarnishing Tiffany's reputation. (Fombrum 42) |
When
readers see emphasis in a quotation, they don't know whether it was already there
or was added by the quoter. Here's how to handle these cases:
| Locke
argues that every individual in the state of nature has a right to enforce the
laws of nature: "the execution of the law of nature is, in that state,
put into every man's hands . . ." (9, emphasis in the original).
For Wollstonecraft, universal
education is critical: "my main argument is built on this simple principle,
that if she [woman] be not prepared by education to become the companion of man,
she will stop the progress of knowledge and virtue; for truth must be common
to all, or it will be inefficacious with respect to its influence on general
practice" (86, emphasis added). | Ellipsis is a fancy
word meaning leaving out some of the words in a quotation. Students are reluctant
to do this, and of course you don't want to change the sense of a passage by leaving
out crucial words. But as I've suggested already, pruning a quotation is one of
the best ways of strengthening a quotation's impact. Be careful, however: you
must notify the reader of any changes, and naturally you cannot change the meaning
of a passage in any material sense. If you leave out words within a quoted sentence,
use ellipsisthree or four dots with spaces between and around them.
3-dot
ellipsis When
you cut some of the words at the beginning of or within a quotation (but less
than a full sentence), use 3-dot ellipsis.
| "Most
of the world's Muslims today . . . are not Arabs and cannot read Arabic"
(Lippman 58). | Note
that you put single spaces around the dots. A considerable number of academic
readers care about such things, so be warned. 4-dot
ellipsis If
the deleted portion of the quotation includes a sentence's terminal punctuation
(the punctuation at the end of a sentence), or if you are using the quotation
to end a sentence in your essay, then you have to add a fourth dot, representing
the period. If you leave out a sentence or more from a quoted passage, you must
also use four-dot ellipsis. Make sure that what you do quote consists of grammatically
complete sentences before and after the ellipsis:
| Frederick
Douglass bores into his listeners' hearts, insisting that no one can truly believe
in the justice of slavery: "There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven,
that does not know that slavery is wrong for him. . . .
At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed"
(Douglass 34). Ann
Hall perceives the difficulty in evaluating O'Neill's Anna Christie: "For
feminist scholars, the conclusion for Anna is ambivalent at best. On the one hand,
she is domesticated; she has relinquished all her ambition, and now stands behind
'her man' in order that he may attain his dreams. . . . On the other hand, Anna
gains a certain degree of independence, ironically through her relationship with
Andersen (174)." | Citations
go at the end of the quotation, of course, and are inserted before the final dot
of 4-dot ellipsis (except for set-off quotationssee above). Here are several
picky little ways to get ellipsis wrong (things like spaces in the wrong places),
and the way to get it right:
| WRONG |
RIGHT |
| "Punctuation
standards have changed over time. . ." (Walters 178) "Punctuation
standards have changed over time..." (Walters 178). "Punctuation
standards have changed over time . . . ." (Walters 178) "Punctuation
standards have changed over time. . . ." (Walters 178) | "Punctuation
standards have changed over time. . ." (Walters 178). | Just
to complicate things, for set-off quotations the parenthetical is placed after
the final dot, the period (see above). Finally,
you don't always need to use ellipsis when you delete words. The reason for ellipsis
is to notify your reader that there are words missing from the quotation. If this
is already obvious from context, you don't need ellipsis:
| WRONG |
RIGHT |
| Walton
oversaw ". . . a massive overhaul of Wal-Mart's inventory system" (147). | Walton
oversaw "a massive overhaul of Wal-Mart's inventory system" (147). |
Students
get confused about punctuating quotations. For in-text quotations, the rules of
American usage are fairly simple: commas and periods go inside the quotation marks
(by convention rather than for any rational reason), and all other punctuation
marks go outside. If, however, these other punctuation marks are part of the original
quotation, then you put them inside the quotation marks. If,
as is usually the case, a parenthetical citation follows the quotation, it generally
goes inside the terminal punctuation. Here's an original passage and various possibilities
in quoting from it:
| SOURCE
At this point
I cannot suppress a sigh and a last hope. What is it that I especially find utterly
unendurable? That I cannot cope with, that makes me choke and faint? Bad air!
Bad air! The approach of some ill-constituted thing; that I have to smell the
entrails of some ill-constituted soul! How
much one is able to endure: distress, want, bad weather, sickness, toil, solitude.
Fundamentally one can cope with everything else, born as one is to a subterranean
life of struggle . . . Friedrich
Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J.
Hollindale. Modern Political Thought: Readings from Machiavelli to Nietzsche,
ed. David Wootton (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996), 917. | Various
quoted versions showing different punctuation:
| Nietzsche's
melancholic energy is unmistakable: "At this point I cannot suppress a sigh
and a last hope. What is it that I especially find utterly unendurable? That I
cannot cope with, that makes me choke and faint? Bad air! Bad air!" (917)
"I cannot suppress,"
Nietzsche says, "a sigh and a last hope" (917). Nietzsche
finds some consolation in the sheer catalog of human suffering: "How much
one is able to endure: distress, want, bad weather, sickness, toil, solitude.
Fundamentally one can cope with everything else. . ." (917).
"What is it,"
Nietzsche asks, "that I especially find utterly unendurable?" (917)
What did Nietzsche mean
when he complained about "bad air" (917)? Nietzsche
envisioned the human condition as "a subterranean life of struggle"
(917); his own difficult life bears testimony to this description. |
Sometimes
you will quote a passage that itself contains quotation marks.
| SOURCE But
though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I
continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction
from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love: "Love your enemies,
bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which
despitefully use you, and persecute you." Was not Amos an extremist for justice:
"Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing
stream." Martin
Luther King, Jr., "Letter from Birmingham Jail." 1963. What Country
Have I? Political Writings by Black Americans, ed. Herbert J. Storing (New
York: St. Martin's Press, 1970), 125-26. | How
you handle this depends on whether the main quotation is long enough to be set
off or not. If it is a short passage that you are incorporating into your text,
then, then you will surround the main quotation with double quotation marks and
mark the inner quotation with single quotation marks:
| Instead of
denying the accusation that he is an extremist, King embraces it: "As I continued
to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the
label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love: 'Love your enemies, bless them that
curse you, do good to them that hate you . . .' " (125-6). |
If it's
a set-off quotation, then put the usual double-quotation marks around the inner
quotation (since quotation marks aren't put around set-off quotations).
For more on quotations see the upcoming
specific documentation styles (MLA, APA,
Chicago, and CBE).
Next: MLA style
Effective quoting |